Congratulations to the recent Nobel Prize winners in Economics! I know, it's not called that, but you know what I mean. There's a plethora of sources you can read to learn more about the winners.
Also, how about some other interesting articles? Monetary views, shale, the Great Depression, currency wars, and China/India/Brazilian growth. I don't really agree with that last one at all, but it's an interesting topic.
Enjoy!
Monday, October 11, 2010
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Friday, July 2, 2010
Bachmann and the global economy, Zimbabwe constitutions, Google's money, and currency standards
Wait... what? Who is this Michele Bachmann person and why don't she understand what 'global economy' means? Politicians confuse me sometimes.
I imagine (best as I can) that things are scary, right now, in a country that needs a new constitution. Zimbabwe has been through a lot, and it's hard to trust those who are making the new document... I doubt they have a significant number of constitutional scholars working on it. Is it a liberal American bias to demand experts be involved in decision making?
I imagine that, upon doing further research, Google discovered that you can't throw money at a problem to fix it. Also, they have less power than they think they do (I'm looking at you, Google China).
While a monetary basket might be a better standard than the dollar, any attempt to make such a basket would be highly political rather than economic in nature. Countries will likely continue making their own decisions in determining currency standards rather than deferring their sovereignty. Though, I suppose, the international lending agencies could make it a requirement of aid.
I imagine (best as I can) that things are scary, right now, in a country that needs a new constitution. Zimbabwe has been through a lot, and it's hard to trust those who are making the new document... I doubt they have a significant number of constitutional scholars working on it. Is it a liberal American bias to demand experts be involved in decision making?
I imagine that, upon doing further research, Google discovered that you can't throw money at a problem to fix it. Also, they have less power than they think they do (I'm looking at you, Google China).
While a monetary basket might be a better standard than the dollar, any attempt to make such a basket would be highly political rather than economic in nature. Countries will likely continue making their own decisions in determining currency standards rather than deferring their sovereignty. Though, I suppose, the international lending agencies could make it a requirement of aid.
Labels:
development,
globalization,
Google,
international economics,
monetary policy,
money,
politics,
trade,
Zimbabwe
Monday, June 14, 2010
Google, unemployment, sports, and loans
More data on Google! This from the World Bank.
Here's a chart showing the duration of unemployment, for the unemployed.
Some Houston sports hotshots (not those) talk about how their sports businesses are going.
Here's a chart showing the duration of unemployment, for the unemployed.
Some Houston sports hotshots (not those) talk about how their sports businesses are going.
Angry Bear has an interesting graph of the number of loans given by banks. I'd like to see the graph go back a few (maybe seven) more years.
Labels:
credit,
economics,
Google,
local economics,
sports,
statistics,
unemployment
Monday, June 7, 2010
Cell phones, optimism, health care systems, and latin america
SCSU also talks about the cell phone industry. Phone-carrier exclusive contracts are frustrating! I wonder when we'll move on from that.
Professor Emerson at Oregon State tells us that we have reason to be optimistic about the economy. I wonder what he thinks about the relationship to inflation.
The WSJ Numbers Guy tells us about the problems of ranking health care systems in different countries. I don't think geography should come into the mix, personally.
The IMF examines why latin america did better during this crisis than during past crises and also other emerging markets. I read a similar observation about Chile, before.
Professor Emerson at Oregon State tells us that we have reason to be optimistic about the economy. I wonder what he thinks about the relationship to inflation.
The WSJ Numbers Guy tells us about the problems of ranking health care systems in different countries. I don't think geography should come into the mix, personally.
The IMF examines why latin america did better during this crisis than during past crises and also other emerging markets. I read a similar observation about Chile, before.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Health care, unemployment, and gifts
Small businesses pay more than large firms for the same health care policies. A quarter of the uninsured are employees in firms smaller than 25 workers.
More, rising unemployment means less health care coverage.
The Game Theorist tells us that gift giving is a bad idea. I'm not sure he's taken all of the externalities into account, though.
Krugman tells us that the health care bill will lean liberal because the facts do. I didn't know facts played such a large part of politics.
More, rising unemployment means less health care coverage.
The Game Theorist tells us that gift giving is a bad idea. I'm not sure he's taken all of the externalities into account, though.
Krugman tells us that the health care bill will lean liberal because the facts do. I didn't know facts played such a large part of politics.
Monday, May 24, 2010
HFT, education, pedigree, and health care
An interview about high frequency trading. Recently, I've been more and more interested in similar topics.
Tyler Cowen thinks about pedigree bias in economics. Economics professors in top schools are very likely to have come from top schools themselves.
SCSU Scholars talks about innovation in health care. I've mentioned this before--technological advances in health care are unlike others. The equipment hasn't gotten smaller or cheaper. There seems to be different incentives at play than economists typically assume. More, given two procedures that give similar results, a doctor will often choose the more expensive procedure, since he can charge more for it. Consumers, meanwhile, don't know their options.
Tyler Cowen thinks about pedigree bias in economics. Economics professors in top schools are very likely to have come from top schools themselves.
SCSU Scholars talks about innovation in health care. I've mentioned this before--technological advances in health care are unlike others. The equipment hasn't gotten smaller or cheaper. There seems to be different incentives at play than economists typically assume. More, given two procedures that give similar results, a doctor will often choose the more expensive procedure, since he can charge more for it. Consumers, meanwhile, don't know their options.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)