Nate Silver makes the claim that the unemployment rate won't hit 10%. Bold, considering there are many expecting it to go well above 10%.
People in the top .01% have 6% of the nation's income, the highest ever. It's interesting how it was so low for so long.
The Economist has an interesting article on instrumental variables. The gist: they attain more accurate answers to less broad questions. Instrumental variables are tools, however. We should never rely on one tool in our toolbox--that has always led us astray. That's just like articles bashing macroeconomics due to "bad" econometric forecasting.
According to this graph, a lot of economists seem to think that the recession is over. That's the WSJ, though, so take that with a grain of salt. The more interesting part, in my opinion, is that the unemployment predictions, on average, don't hit 10%. More predictions here.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Unemployment rate <10%, income distribution, IV, the recession's end, and unemployment again
Labels:
econometrics,
economic techniques,
economics,
forecasts,
income,
inequality,
labor,
recession,
unemployment,
wages
1 comment:
Nice post you got here. It would be great to read more concerning that theme. Thnx for giving that data.
Sexy Lady
Asian escorts London
Post a Comment